When Amazon tries to compete with Apple in the tablet market
Amazon tried to penetrate the tablet market lately with its new Kindle Fire, trying to create a cheap yet quality alternative to Apple's iPad, by far the most dominant tablet computer. As we learn today from the New York Times, it might be more difficult than what it looked like to Amazon in the first place.The article ("As Kindle Fire Faces Critics, Remedies Are Promised") reveals that the Kindle Fire is generating a lot of negative customer feedback and therefore Amazon Amazon, although it does not say so, is soon likely to release an improved version of the device.
What's wrong with the Kindle Fire? The article explains: "A few of their many complaints: there is no external volume control. The off switch is easy to hit by accident. Web pages take a long time to load. There is no privacy on the device; a spouse or child who picks it up will instantly know everything you have been doing. The touch screen is frequently hesitant and sometimes downright balky."Some analysts think customers can still live with it, given the $199 price tag - “I would have expected things to be even worse at this point,” Gene Munster, an analyst with Piper Jaffray, said, adding that initial buyers were usually the most critical. Pricing will save the Fire, he predicted. At $199 versus $500 for an iPad, “Amazon has a lot of air cover to have a B-level product.”But Amazon can't count on it, which is why we're going to see soon, according to the article probably in the spring, an improved version of the device.The lesson to Amazon is clear - you need to come more prepared when you try to penetrate new markets and generate high expectations of your new products.The lesson to consumers is also clear - don't buy the Kindle Fire now. Save your money and wait for the Kindle Fire 2.Those of you who are interested in learning more about tablet technology can find information on classes from Guide to Online Schools.Yours,
Raz @ Eco-Libris
Eco-Libris: Check our special holiday offer!
Related Posts
How green is the Kindle Fire - part 3: Will it kill B&N and drive the bookseller into bankruptcy?Today we continue with our Amazon week. After discussing if the new Kindle Fire and other new Kindles will contribute to making e-reading greener (it will), and comparing Kindle Fire with iPad 2 and ... readmore
Barnes & Noble Bankruptcy Index: The failure of Groupon's special coupon dealWhile Borders, the nation’s second-largest book chain, is on the verge of bankruptcy, we continue to look at Barnes & Noble, the nation's largest book chain to see if they follow will Borders and ... readmore
Dear Jeff Bezos - Part 2: I get a disappointing answer and try again!Couple of days ago I wrote to Jeff Bezos, explaining to him that I'm considering to buy the Kindle but I first want to know more about the Kindle's environmental and social impacts.I wrote Jeff Bez ... readmore
Where readers buy their ebooks? Week 4 of our 10-week survey: Google eBookstore? Nada!This is the fourth week of our ebook experiment. Like all experiment, it begins with a question: Where will readers look to buy their ebooks? Following the launch of Google eBookstore, its relationsh ... readmore
Comparing between the iPad and the iPad 2 from a green perspectiveLast week the environmental report of the iPad 2, where we learned that its carbon footprint is 105 kg CO2e, a reduction of 19.2% comparing to the footprint of the first model. On Tuesday we started ... readmore
Amazon tried to penetrate the tablet market lately with its new Kindle Fire, trying to create a cheap yet quality alternative to Apple's iPad, by far the most dominant tablet computer. As we learn today from the New York Times, it might be more difficult than what it looked like to Amazon in the first place.
